When Genes, Enzymes, and Timing Collide: Pharmacogenetics, drug interactions, and why psychiatry is complex medical care
- Anton Surja
- Feb 4
- 4 min read

Psychiatry is often misunderstood as “just prescribing medications.”
In reality, it is one of the few specialties where brain, biology, behavior, and biochemistry collide—sometimes with consequences that are subtle, and sometimes with consequences that are dangerous.
Over the past two decades, my research and clinical work have focused on one recurring theme: medications do not act in isolation, and neither do patients.
Two of my early publications—one on lamotrigine rash following carbamazepine discontinuation (2005) (1), and another on CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics and aripiprazole-related extrapyramidal symptoms (2008) (2) —highlight different sides of the same reality: psychiatric prescribing is deeply medical, and errors in understanding metabolism and interactions can cause harm.
The invisible machinery: metabolism matters
Most psychiatric medications are processed by the liver’s cytochrome P450 enzyme system, including:
CYP2D6
CYP2C19
CYP1A2
CYP3A4
More than 70–80% of psychotropic medications rely on these enzymes for clearance.
Variability comes from:
Genetics (pharmacogenetics)
Drug–drug interactions
Enzyme induction and de-induction
Smoking, diet, hormones
Timing of medication changes
Ignoring any one of these can be clinically consequential.
Case example #1 (2005):
Surja A, Broetzge K, El-Mallakh R: Serious rash with Lamotrigine after carbamazepine discontinuation; Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2005, 66 (#): 401-402
We described a patient who developed a serious rash with lamotrigine after carbamazepine was discontinued. Lamotrigine is one of the medication that carry high risk of consequences if not done properly which can lead to serious rash such as SJS--Steven Johnson Syndrome or even Toxic Erythema Necrolisis (TEN) with high rate of mortality.
This was not a coincidence.
What happened can be explained biologically
Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer
It accelerates metabolism of lamotrigine via UGT enzymes
While carbamazepine is present, lamotrigine levels stay lower
When carbamazepine is stopped:
Enzyme induction fades over 1–3 weeks
Lamotrigine clearance drops
Serum lamotrigine levels can double or triple
Rash risk increases dramatically
Importantly:
The lamotrigine dose had not changed
The patient did nothing “wrong”
The danger came from timing and metabolic shift
This still matters today
Serious lamotrigine rash occurs in ~0.3–0.8% of adults
Risk increases with:
Rapid titration
Valproate coadministration
Changes in enzyme induction status
This case illustrated an enduring lesson:
Stopping a medication can be just as dangerous as starting one—if metabolism is not understood.
Case example #2 (2008):
Surja A, Reynolds K, Linder M, El-Mallakh R: Pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2D6 in patient with Aripiprazole-related Extrapyramidal symptoms: a case -control study; Personalized Medicine 2008, 5 (4): 361-365
We published one of the early clinical studies examining CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics in children who developed extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) on aripiprazole—then widely viewed as a low-risk antipsychotic due to unique Dopamine D2 partial agonist activity.
What we observed then
All patients with EPS had reduced CYP2D6 function
50% were poor metabolizers
50% were intermediate metabolizers
Symptoms occurred at standard or low doses
At the time, this was among the earliest signals that:
“Atypical” does not mean metabolically neutral
Genetic variability can affect tolerability, not just blood levels
Later, larger studies showed mixed results—confirming higher drug exposure in poor metabolizers but weaker, inconsistent correlations with clinical EPS. That evolution of evidence is expected and healthy science.
Early studies generate hypotheses; They don’t provide final answers—but they shape the questions we continue to ask.
Genetics vs reality: why pharmacogenetics is helpful—but incomplete
5–10% of individuals of European ancestry are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers and even more in certain population such as Asian, Middle Eastern and Native population
30–40% are intermediate metabolizers
Up to 80% higher plasma drug concentrations have been documented in poor metabolizers for certain drugs
But here’s the catch:
Genetics can be overridden
Bupropion can reduce CYP2D6 activity by ~90%
Fluoxetine and paroxetine functionally convert normal metabolizers into poor metabolizers
Smoking induces CYP1A2 and can lower clozapine levels by up to 50%
Enzyme induction or de-induction can occur within days to weeks
This phenomenon—phenoconversion—is invisible to DNA tests.
This matters for patient safety
Pharmacogenetic testing can be helpful, but it cannot replace:
Fundamental understanding enzyme induction and inhibition
Knowing half-lives and washout periods
Anticipating delayed metabolic effects
Monitoring during transitions—not just steady states
The lamotrigine–carbamazepine case is a reminder that danger often lies in transitions, not maintenance. It perfectly sums up "You don't know what you don't know"
Psychiatry is medical care—full stop
These cases illustrate why psychiatry is not simply about choosing a medication from a list.
It requires:
Deep knowledge of pharmacology
Understanding of physiology and metabolism
Ability to anticipate delayed adverse effects
Medical training in managing risk, not just symptoms
Medication interactions, enzyme shifts, and genetic variability are not abstract concepts—they affect real patients, sometimes with irreversible consequences.
This is why experience matters.
Choosing a psychiatrist: why training and credentials matter
Psychiatric medications:
Affect multiple organ systems
Interact with hormones, smoking, diet, and other drugs
Can cause severe adverse effects when mismanaged
A psychiatrist with medical training (MD/DO) brings:
Full understanding of systemic physiology
Training in medication safety and adverse event recognition
Experience integrating genetics, interactions, and clinical context
Psychiatry is not “just prescribing.” It is medical decision-making under uncertainty, informed by science and experience.
Final reflection
Over 20 years, the science has advanced—but the core lesson remains unchanged:
Genes matter. Enzymes matter. Timing matters. But, clinical judgment matters most.
Pharmacogenetics is a valuable tool when used thoughtfully. Drug–drug interactions are predictable when understood. Harm occurs when complexity is underestimated.
Good psychiatric care respects that complexity—because patients deserve nothing less.



Comments